WV2 waimanalo deglinting

Imaging geometry
from 11MAR31215109-M2AS-052656310070_01_P002.IMD from DigitalGlobe
looking right into the sun and sideways!!

meanSunAz = 146.5;
    meanSunEl = 70.0;
    meanSatAz = 306.1; sensor looks SE, right into the sun
    meanSatEl = 47.1;
    meanInTrackViewAngle = 14.9;
    meanCrossTrackViewAngle = -34.8;
    meanOffNadirViewAngle = 37.5; sensor looks full sideways

April 10th
Glint Correlations

Glint regressions based on band 8 Again, it would seem that this image is not raw from data provider: *"the band images after subtracting an estimate of the deep water upwelling radiance"??* Pixels at Zero cause a bad distortion of the glint regression: they MUST be bypassed	Glint regressions based on band 7
BiDim histograms over deep waters band 8 is well correlated with bands 6, 4 and 1	BiDim histograms over deep waters band 7 is well correlated with bands 5, 3 and 2
7 vs 8 6 vs 8 3 vs 8 2 vs 8	5 vs 8 4 vs 8 1 vs 8
6 vs 7 5 vs 7 2 vs 7 1 vs 7	4 vs 7 3 vs 7 A weird pattern of interband correlations is observed: NIR band 8 is well correlated with bands 6, 4 and 1 NIR band 7 is well correlated with bands 5 , 3 and 2 this must be accounted for to improve deglinting

Glint in bands 7 and 8 are offset Lowest radiance goes down to zero in raw data I had to offset them a bit, as ZERO is NODATA by default!
bands 2, 3, 5 and 7 Note the residues of glint in deglinted data in spite of plain strong smoothing and of smart deglinting	bands 1, 4, 6 and 8 See that the glint regressions yield suitable estimation of spectral deep water radiances: -Lsw/044.7/029.3/010.6/009.3/009.5/000.0/000.1/000.1