RasHatibahCZ07 the above results raised quite some alarming comments (March 25th 2010) | RasHatibahCZ07 the above results raised quite some alarming comments (March 25th 2010) |
 rashatibahCZ07.pix: Channel 16 | What changes I have made (March 27th 2010) - seen that all 3 images with gaps create all sorts of problems: ETM_2007-12-23 ETM_2008-10-22 ETM_2009-10-09
- seen that ETM_1999-11-15 creates all sorts of problems
- came up with a select few seven images for rashatibahCZ07
- 01 ETM_1999-07-10.pix
- 02 ETM_1999-11-15.pix.bz2 is out
- 03 ETM_2000-11-01.pix
- 04 ETM_2001-11-04.pix
- 05 ETM_2002-06-16.pix
- 06 ETM_2002-08-19.pix
- 07 ETM_2003-01-10.pix
- 08 ETM_2007-12-23.pix.bz2 is out
- 09 ETM_2008-10-22.pix.bz2 is out
- 10 ETM_2009-10-09.pix.bz2 is out
- 11 TM_1990-11-06.pix
- imposed a more stringent Lm condition on ETM_2003-01-10:
- all 11 images were processed with -Lm/0001.0/001.0/10.0p/255.0, a rather bold statement!
- now ETM_2003-01-10 is processed with -Lm/0001.0/002.5/10.0p/255.0, a much more conservative statement!
- taken a closer look at my ZCombiner tool: see that the land mask is now more acceptable!
- Well, I suppose I needed the time, and some interaction on your part.
|
 rashatibahCZ07.pix: Channel 15 Standard deviation on final averaged depth in decimeters |  rashatibahCZ07.pix: Channel 14 N on final averaged depth |
 rashatibahCZ07.pix: Channel 13 Deepest depth over 11 images in decimeters |  rashatibahCZ07.pix: Channel 12 Shows which image is deepest 2 - blue for ETM_1999-11-15 11 - purple for TM_1990-11-06 ... |