WorldView 2 image Marmion Marine Park, Western Australia
June 2nd 2012, 11800*12500, 2 m ground resolution, 24.6 km * 25 km
 
image from Digital Globe
"(c) DigitalGlobe, Inc. All Rights Reserved"
"Includes copyrighted material of DigitalGlobe, Inc., All Rights Reserved"
work done in january 2013
home
 

perth-mosaic-data
perth-mosaic-pan
perth-mosaic-calibration
perth-mosaic-results

 
 
 
Is the PAN band trustworthy
for water column correction?

The problem
Noise and penetration
Optical calibration
Using the PAN band







The problem
The problem
  • In 4SM, Yellow band may be used down to ~12 m in clear waters over bright bottoms, much less over dark bottoms:
    • Yellow against Green, Blue and Purple
  • In 4SM, where Yellow band is extinct, we are left with
    • Green against Blue and Purple
  • In 4SM, where Yellow band is extinct, the combination Green against Blue and Purple cannot resolve variations in bottom greenness:
    • green    bottoms yield underestimated depths
    • brown  bottoms yield   overestimated depths
The solution: use the Panchro band
  • The WV2 panchromatic band covers most of the multispectral bands at 0.5 m ground resolution
  • Once 4x4 sum-aggregated to 2 m ground resolution, the PAN pixel becomes 16 times stronger, and is co-registered with the MULTI pixel
  • Its effective wavelength is very high at shallow bottom depths and decreases gradually as the bottom depth increases
  • Therefore the PAN band may not be calibrated into a constant diffuse attenuation coefficient
    • as Kpan decreases gradually as the bottom depth increases





Noise and penetration

Yellow band
  • it is much less noisy than the PAN band
  • it exhibits penetration down to at most ~12 m in very clear waters over very bright bottoms

Panchromatic band 
  • it is still quite noisy:
    • striping is bad; this warrants high threshold
  • it exhibits penetration up to 20 m here over very bright bottoms 
  • this is distinctly deeper than Yellow band
  • but still much less than Green band

Green band
  • it is much less noisy than the PAN band
  • it exhibits penetration down to at most ~40 m in very clear waters over very bright bottoms



Calibrating the PAN band

Calibration diagram 
for bands Blue, PAN, Yellow and Red bands

BiDim histogram only shows shallow pixels

Calibration diagram 
for bands Purple, PAN, Yellow and Red bands

BiDim histogram only shows shallow pixels
This assumes the Brightest pixels
are over brightest bottoms
This assumes the Brightest pixels 
are over brightest bottoms

 
Collecting BPL pixels for optical calibration
requires quite a lot of masking of alien pixels
in this image
Collecting BPL pixels for optical calibration
requires quite a lot of masking of alien pixels
in this image

 



 
Using the PAN band for modeling: most promising

Z4 vs Z5 along Profile_Black

This plot compares depth results obtained as follows:
  • Z4: GREEN uses PAN
    • against        Green_Blue_Purple
  • Z5: RED      uses Yellow
    • against Pan_Green_Blue_Purple
  • The correlation is quite good: R2=0.87
  • Therefore, where the Yellow band is extinct, the Pan band can take over efficiently
 
 

It also displays the BOA watercolumn corrected reflectance for the Purple, Blue and Green bands obtained while modeling Z5:
  • over the 0-6 m depth range, and from very dark to fairly bright bottoms, the range of bottom types is quite large, as illustrated by these plots

Location of profile black
 
Altogether, this result is excellent
  • It gives a strong indication that, YES, the Panchromatic band is trustworthy for watercolumn correction work, at least over the 0-6 m depth range here
  • Essentially, it depicts an evenly sloping  platform with very strong variations in bottom brightness
    • covered in green vegetation over the bright areas: see section B from 0.4 to 1.2 km
    • covered in brown vegetation over dark areas: see section D from 1.0 to 2.3 km
  • Note that depths are consistant over very dark shoals with isolated very bright spots







 
 


 
PAN depth range
beats
Yellow depth range
by large
  • It remains to be seen how Pan against Purple, Blue and Green behave over deeper bottoms
  • This can only be investigated using suitable seatruth
 
 
Potential for bottom typing
  • Watercolumn-corrected BOA reflectances are shown in these plots for the Purple, Blue and Green bands
  • Note that the potential for bottom typing is excellent
    • mainly dark brown spectral signatures in section D from 1.0 to 2.5 km, with a few local green signatures
    • mainly bright green spectral signatures in section B from 0.4 to 1.2 km
    • shoals are clearly very dark brown bottoms
 
 
 



Créer un site
Créer un site