![]() TCC This is August 2002 | ![]() FCC |
![]() TCC and LIDAR backdrop | ![]() |
Excellent glint regressions over open waters 1 26 SGslope 1.228727 SGbias 103.292915 SGr2 0.995059 2 26 SGslope 1.394632 SGbias 89.533821 SGr2 0.986218 3 26 SGslope 1.280739 SGbias 84.920891 SGr2 0.997350 4 26 SGslope 1.394083 SGbias 73.874840 SGr2 0.991872 5 26 SGslope 1.425714 SGbias 64.087433 SGr2 0.992525 6 26 SGslope 1.333447 SGbias 59.696606 SGr2 0.998062 7 26 SGslope 1.361507 SGbias 53.593960 SGr2 0.998218 8 26 SGslope 1.481895 SGbias 48.280697 SGr2 0.995494 9 26 SGslope 1.424623 SGbias 42.779137 SGr2 0.996434 10 26 SGslope 1.419916 SGbias 40.414928 SGr2 0.999064 11 26 SGslope 1.439740 SGbias 35.293301 SGr2 0.999152 12 26 SGslope 1.426970 SGbias 31.258053 SGr2 0.999099 13 26 SGslope 1.495983 SGbias 26.848738 SGr2 0.992261 14 26 SGslope 1.353670 SGbias 23.184286 SGr2 0.997265 15 26 SGslope 1.547958 SGbias 25.377361 SGr2 0.998393 16 26 SGslope 1.533778 SGbias 22.721312 SGr2 0.996595 17 26 SGslope 1.519945 SGbias 20.088564 SGr2 0.998770 18 26 SGslope 1.498793 SGbias 18.672709 SGr2 0.998977 19 26 SGslope 1.638540 SGbias 17.196733 SGr2 0.994523 20 26 SGslope 1.563691 SGbias 16.404911 SGr2 0.999031 21 26 SGslope 1.560109 SGbias 15.720223 SGr2 0.998575 22 26 SGslope 1.511358 SGbias 14.840402 SGr2 0.999251 23 26 SGslope 1.564502 SGbias 12.947001 SGr2 0.998961 24 26 SGslope 1.546146 SGbias 12.091436 SGr2 0.998858 25 26 SGslope 1.594506 SGbias 11.901584 SGr2 0.995002 26 26 SGslope 1.000000 SGbias 0.000000 SGr2 0.000000 |
![]() Profile Red also shows the LIDAR DTM: resampled to 30 m pixels | ![]() TCC deglinted |
Therefore, we may conclude that the waters are turbid as far as km 11 This can explain why Jeannette Arce Arce limited her investigations to a very shallow depth range, where ignoring the deep water radiance does not make much of a difference: Xi= ln (Li) (11) while we write Xi= ln (Li-Lswi), following Philpot, and Maritorena | ![]() Deglinting along Profile Red also shows the LIDAR depth backdrop |