geraldton-tm-20090110-3

cWL[green] seems to depend on the path radiance
islands = lower path radiance ==> cWL[green] = 0.58
coast = higher path radiance ==> cWL[green] = 0.45

cWL[green]=0.45 is good for the coast	cWL[green]=0.58 is bad for the coast
PlotZ23 along the purple profile cWL[green]=0.45 is bad for the islands	PlotZ23 along the purple profile cWL[green]=0.58 is good for the islands

Water column corrected image, TCC Results along the coast are probably artifact , except in the southernmost part Negative bottom contrast was enabled in order to get results in the southernmost part: this entails fancy depth results and ~null bottom brightness where negative bottom contrast is not substantiated by even a faint bottom detection in the green band: this has been filtered out	Computed depth Results along the coast are probably artifact , except in the southernmost part Negative bottom contrast was enabled in order to get results in the southernmost part: this entails fancy depth results and ~null bottom brightness where negative bottom contrast is not substantiated by even a faint bottom detection in the green band: this has been filtered out
Normalized bottom reflectance, TCC	Computed depth
Deglinted TCC	Water column corrected TCC a "low-tide view"
Computed depth Note shoaling sand dunes/spits	Average bottom brightness Note that everything is very dark down there