![]() FCC | ![]() TCC |
![]() fakaravaHYP_20110403_24_21_11_4 Blue=band 4 Green=band 11 Observed K4/K11=0.500 | ![]() fakaravaHYP_20110403_24_22_12_3 |
![]() fakaravaHYP_20110403_24_22_13_2 | ![]() fakaravaHYP_20110403_23_18_14_1 |
![]() fakaravaHYP_20110403_25_21_11_4 all bands in the green-red bands are aggregated to create a synthetic PAN channel which is placed in band 25 For the Blue vs PAN linearized plot, i.e. X4 vs X25, isobaths are drawn at a 1 m step Modeling shall use the PAN solution (grey) assisted by the Green solution see image WZ | ![]() Observed Kblue/Kgreen=0.500 This yields an interpolated water type O1B + 0.080 for this image, by use of Jerlov's classification of optical marine water types, with Kblue=0.073 m-1 for band 4 and Kgreen=0.145 m-1 for band 11 All other Kx values are computed by application of the ratios Kblue/Kx and Kgreen/Kx observed in the image. |
![]() Z in cm Retrieved depths probably underestimated where bottom brightness is very dark | ![]() image B Very dark bottoms are most dubious Possibly caused by cyanobacterial plancton |
![]() FCC | ![]() TCC |
![]() fakaravaHYP_20110921_24_21_11_4 Blue=band 4 Green=band 11 Observed K4/K11=0.590 | ![]() fakaravaHYP_20110921_24_22_12_3 |
![]() fakaravaHYP_20110921_24_22_13_2 | ![]() fakaravaHYP_20110921_23_18_14_1 |
![]() fakaravaHYP_20110921_25_21_11_4 all bands in the green-red bands are aggregated to create a synthetic PAN channel which is placed in band 25 For the Blue vs PAN linearized plot, i.e. X4 vs X25, isobaths are drawn at a 1 m step Modeling shall use the PAN solution in the 0-29 depth range | ![]() Observed Kblue/Kgreen=0.590 This yields an interpolated water type O1B + 0.49 for this image, by use of Jerlov's classification of optical marine water types, with Kblue=0.093 m-1 for band 4 and Kgreen=0.157 m-1 for band 11 All other Kx values are computed by application of the ratios Kblue/Kx and Kgreen/Kx observed in the image: Kx=(Kblue/Kx)/(Kgreen/Kx) |